3.8 Article

Psychological profiles of irritable bowel syndrome patients with different phenotypes

Journal

INTESTINAL RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 459-+

Publisher

KOREAN ASSOC STUDY INTESTINAL DISEASES
DOI: 10.5217/ir.2019.09171

Keywords

Irritable bowel syndrome; MMPI-2; Depression; Sex; Life stress events

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Abnormal psychological profiles are frequently found in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The present study aimed to evaluate the psychological profiles of FGID patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and IBS phenotypes. Methods: In 608 FGID patients, including 235 with IBS, have filled a Rome III questionnaire and the French version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2. Data analysis was performed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Results: This study shows that IBS patients have abnormal psychological profiles with more significant symptom exaggeration and decreased test defensiveness than non-IBS patients. They have a significantly higher score for all clinical scales. Logistic regression analysis showed in IBS patients a decrease of body mass index (P = 0.002), and test defensiveness score K (P = 0.001) and an increase of Hypochondriasis (P< 0.001) and Masculinity-Femininity scale (P = 0.018). By comparison with non-IBS patients, IBS-constipation, IBS-diarrhea, and mixed IBS patients have increased Hypochondriasis value and Depression score, mixed IBS patients have higher Psychasthenia score and higher Hypomania score. No item was significantly different in the IBS-unspecified group. Conclusions: This study shows that IBS patients have different psychological profiles than other FGID patients and that psychological characteristics are associated with IBS phenotypes except for patients with unsubtyped IBS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available