4.7 Article

Renormalization of the tensor current in lattice QCD and the J/ψ tensor decay constant

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094509

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BEIS capital funding via STFC [ST/P002307/1, ST/R002452/1, ST/R00689X/1]
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000466/1, ST/P000746/1]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. STFC [ST/L000636/1, ST/T001348/1, ST/P003400/1, ST/V002376/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/S003916/1, ST/R001006/1, ST/S003762/1, ST/M007006/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/T001372/1, ST/R00689X/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/R000832/1, ST/P000746/1, ST/L000466/1, ST/T00049X/1, ST/M007618/1, ST/R001049/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/P000673/1, ST/P002307/1, ST/R002452/1, ST/P002447/1, ST/M006530/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lattice QCD calculations of form factors for rare Standard Model processes such as B -> Kl(+)l(-) use tensor currents that require renormalization. These renormalization factors, Z(T), have typically been calculated within perturbation theory and the estimated uncertainties from missing higher order terms are significant. Here we study tensor current renormalization using lattice implementations of momentumsubtraction schemes. Such schemes are potentially more accurate but have systematic errors from nonperturbative artifacts. To determine and remove these condensate contributions we calculate the ground-state charmonium tensor decay constant, f(J/psi)(T), which is also of interest in beyond the Standard Model studies. We obtain f(J/psi)(T) ((MS) over bar, 2 GeV) = 0.3927(27) GeV, with ratio to the vector decay constant of 0.9569(52), significantly below 1. We also give ZT factors, converted to the (MS) over bar scheme, corrected for condensate contamination. This contamination reaches 1.5% at a renormalization scale of 2 GeV (in the preferred Regularisation Invariant Symmetric Momentum subtraction scheme) and so must be removed for accurate results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available