4.7 Article

Effect of phosphorus on the properties of phosphogypsum-based cemented backfill

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 399, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122993

Keywords

Hydration; Waste management; Stabilization/Solidification; Eutrophication

Funding

  1. Project of Key Research Development Program of Hunan [2017SK2251]
  2. Hunan Natural Science Foundation [2018JJ3664]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of Central South University [2019zzts305]
  4. Central South University Special Scholarship for Study Abroad

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When phosphogypsum (PG) is used as an aggregate for backfill, phosphate in the PG might influence the hydration process and escape into the environment. The current study aimed to understand phosphate dynamics during the PG-based backfilling process by adding different amounts and types of phosphates (H3PO4, KH2PO4, K3PO4, and Ca-3(PO4)(2)). The results indicate that the majority of the phosphate was first immobilized by PG depending on the types, and the residual dissolved phosphate (RDP) could be further stabilized/solidified (S/S) in the backfill via the hydration process. However, increasing RDP content lowered unconfined compressive strength of the backfill, attributing to the suppression of the hydration process and a loosened backfill structure. Furthermore, the environmental behavior of phosphate was studied by measuring dissolved phosphate in bleeding water and leachate. For bleeding water, a high RDP content might lead to the phosphate concentration exceeding the national standard limit (GB 8978-1996) depending on the phosphate types, and it was recommended that the RDP content should be controlled or converted to Ca-3(PO4)(2) or K3PO4 before PG inclusion into in the backfill. For leachate, the phosphate concentration was always below the standard limit, indicating that the cemented backfill ensured long-term S/S of the phosphate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available