4.7 Article

Multimodal brain-age prediction and cardiovascular risk: The Whitehall II MRI sub-study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117292

Keywords

Multimodal MRI; Brain age prediction; Machine learning; Cardiovascular risk

Funding

  1. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Programme Grant: Predicting MRI abnormalities with longitudinal data of the Whitehall II Substudy (UK Medical Research Council) [G1001354]
  2. HDH Wills 1965 Charitable Trust [1117747]
  3. UK Biobank Access Committee [27412]
  4. Research Council of Norway [286838, 276082, 273345, 249795, 223273]
  5. South-East Norway Regional Health Authority [2015073, 2019107]
  6. European Research Council under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [802998, 732592]
  7. UK Medical Research Council [R024227, S011676]
  8. US National Institute on Aging [R01AG062553]
  9. NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre [HQR00984]
  10. UK Research and Innovation [MR/R024790/1]
  11. Alzheimer's Society [441]
  12. Monument Trust Discovery Award from Parkinsons UK [J-1403]
  13. MRC Dementias Platform UK [MR/L023784/2]
  14. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z]
  15. Academy of Finland [311492]
  16. MRC [MR/K013351/1, MR/R024790/1, MR/R024227/1, G1001354, MR/S011676/1, MR/L023784/2, MR/R024790/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain age is becoming a widely applied imaging-based biomarker of neural aging and potential proxy for brain integrity and health. We estimated multimodal and modality-specific brain age in the Whitehall II (WHII) MRI cohort using machine learning and imaging-derived measures of gray matter (GM) morphology, white matter microstructure (WM), and resting state functional connectivity (FC). The results showed that the prediction accuracy improved when multiple imaging modalities were included in the model (R-2 = 0.30, 95% CI [0.24, 0.36]). The modality-specific GM and WM models showed similar performance (R-2 = 0.22 [0.16, 0.27] and R-2 = 0.24 [0.18, 0.30], respectively), while the FC model showed the lowest prediction accuracy (R-2 = 0.002 [-0.005, 0.008]), indicating that the FC features were less related to chronological age compared to structural measures. Follow-up analyses showed that FC predictions were similarly low in a matched sub-sample from UK Biobank, and although FC predictions were consistently lower than GM predictions, the accuracy improved with increasing sample size and age range. Cardiovascular risk factors, including high blood pressure, alcohol intake, and stroke risk score, were each associated with brain aging in the WHII cohort. Blood pressure showed a stronger association with white matter compared to gray matter, while no differences in the associations of alcohol intake and stroke risk with these modalities were observed. In conclusion, machine-learning based brain age prediction can reduce the dimensionality of neuroimaging data to provide meaningful biomarkers of individual brain aging. However, model performance depends on study-specific characteristics including sample size and age range, which may cause discrepancies in findings across studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available