4.6 Article

Macro-Scale Tread Patterns for Traction in the Intestine

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages 3262-3273

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2982242

Keywords

Colon; Intestines; Friction; Substrates; Cancer; Robots; Endoscopes; Biotribology; functional surfaces; intestinal friction; robotic endoscopy

Funding

  1. University of Dundee
  2. University of Leeds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Goal: Tread patterns are widely used to increase traction on different substrates, with the tread scale, geometry and material being tailored to the application. This work explores the efficacy of using macro-scale tread patterns for a medical application involving a colon substrate - renowned for its low friction characteristics. Methods: Current literature was first summarized before an experimental approach was used, based on a custom test rig with ex vivo porcine colon, to assess different macroscale tread patterns. Performance was based on increasing traction while avoiding significant trauma. Repeated testing (n = 16) was used to obtain robust results. Results: A macro-scale tread pattern can increase the traction coefficient significantly, with a static traction coefficient of 0.74 +/- 0.22 and a dynamic traction coefficient of 0.35 +/- 0.04 compared to a smooth (on the macro-scale) Control (0.132 +/- 0.055 and 0.054 +/- 0.015, respectively). Decreasing the scale and spacing between the tread features reduced apparent trauma but also reduced the traction coefficient. Conclusion: Significant traction can be achieved on colon tissue using a macro-scale tread but a compromise between traction (large feature sizes) and trauma (small feature sizes) may have to be made. Significance: This work provides greater insight into the complex frictional mechanisms of the intestine and gives suggestions for developing functional tread surfaces for a wide range of clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available