4.3 Article

Calculating and estimating second cancer risk from breast radiotherapy using Monte Carlo code with internal body scatter for each out-of-field organ

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 62-73

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13060

Keywords

breast cancer; low‐ dose bath; Monte Carlo simulation; radiotherapy; second cancer risk

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18K07646]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K07646] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Out-of-field organs are not commonly designated as dose calculation targets during radiation therapy treatment planning, but they might entail risks of second cancer. Risk components include specific internal body scatter, which is a dominant source of out-of-field doses, and head leakage, which can be reduced by external shielding. Our simulation study quantifies out-of-field organ doses and estimates second cancer risks attributable to internal body scatter in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without additional regional nodal radiotherapy (RNRT), respectively, for right and left breast cancer using Monte Carlo code PHITS. Simulations were conducted using a complete whole-body female model. Second cancer risk was estimated using the calculated doses with a concept of excess absolute risk. Simulation results revealed marked differences between WBRT alone and WBRT plus RNRT in out-of-field organ doses. The ratios of mean doses between them were as large as 3.5-8.0 for the head and neck region and about 1.5-6.6 for the lower abdominal region. Potentially, most out-of-field organs had excess absolute risks of less than 1 per 10,000 persons-year. Our study surveyed the respective contributions of internal body scatter to out-of-field organ doses and second cancer risks in breast radiotherapy on this intact female model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available