4.7 Article

A novel tree-based dynamic heterogeneous ensemble method for credit scoring

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113615

Keywords

Credit scoring; Selective ensemble; Random forests; Gradient boosting decision tree; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Research Support Project for Doctoral Degree Teachers of Jiangsu Normal University [18XWRX021]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71874185]
  3. National Social Science Foundation of China [15BTJ033]
  4. Undergraduate Innovation Training Program of Jiangsu Province [201910320057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ensemble models have been extensively applied to credit scoring. However, advanced tree-based classifiers have been seldom utilized as components of ensemble models. Moreover, few studies have considered dynamic ensemble selection. To fill the research gap, this paper aims to develop a novel tree-based overfitting-cautious heterogeneous ensemble model (i.e., OCHE) for credit scoring which departs from existing literature on base models and ensemble selection strategy. Regarding base models, tree-based techniques are employed to acquire a balance between predictive accuracy and computational cost. In terms of ensemble selection, the proposed method can assign weights to base models dynamically according to the overfitting measure. Validated on five public datasets, the proposed approach is compared with several popular benchmark models and selection strategies on predictive accuracy and computational cost measures. For predictive accuracy, the proposed approach outperforms the benchmark models significantly in most cases based on the non-parametric significance test. It also performs marginally better than several state-of-the-art studies. Our proposal remains robust in several scenarios. In terms of computational cost, the proposed method provides acceptable performance and benefits from GPU acceleration considerably. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available