4.3 Article

Transcriptional profiling of embryo cryotolerance

Journal

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 87, Issue 12, Pages 1245-1259

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.23436

Keywords

bovine; cryosurvival; embryonic competence; postcryopreservation resumption of development; quality

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cryosurvival of embryos is a complex process involving dynamic and integrated morphological, functional, and molecular changes. Here, we evaluated the transcriptional profiling of bovine embryos possessing high and low cryotolerance (HC and LC, respectively) by assessing the resumption of development. Embryos were produced in vitro (N = 1137) and cryopreserved (N = 894). Blastocysts samples possessed pronounced group individualization at RNA sequencing. A total of 114 genes were differentially expressed, and 27 and 84 genes were upregulated in HC and LC, respectively. Among the over-represented biological functions, cellular growth and proliferation, cell death and survival, and organismal survival were predicted to be activated, while cellular movement and cell-to-cell signaling were predicted to be inhibited in HC embryos. Enriched canonical pathways and upstream regulators related to cellular proliferation and survival (HC), inflammatory processes, and cell death (LC) were predicted to represent two embryonic molecular profiles present during the resumption of development after cryopreservation. The marked contrast in transcriptional profiles between HC and LC strongly suggests the influence of embryonic competence after cryopreservation on its respective transcriptome and indicated that HC and LC presented two different molecular strategies to overcome cryopreservation-related stress and resume postcryopreservation development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available