4.8 Article

Plasmonic Electronic Raman Scattering as Internal Standard for Spatial and Temporal Calibration in Quantitative Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 22, Pages 9543-9551

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03056

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Young Investigator Award [FA9550-18-1-0328]
  2. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [70NANB18H201, 70NANB19H163]
  3. University of Maryland [70NANB14H209]
  4. National Institute of Standards and Technology Physical Measurement Laboratory through the University of Maryland [70NANB14H209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) still faces difficulties in quantitative analysis because of its susceptibility to local optical field variations at plasmonic hotspots in metallo-dielectric nanostructures. Current SERS calibration approaches using Raman tags have inherent limitations due to spatial occupation competition with analyte molecules, spectral interference with analyte Raman peaks, and photodegradation. Herein, we report that plasmon-enhanced electronic Raman scattering (ERS) signals from metal can serve as an internal standard for spatial and temporal calibration of molecular Raman scattering (MRS) signals from analyte molecules at the same hotspots, enabling rigorous quantitative SERS analysis. We observe a linear dependence between ERS and MRS signal intensities upon spatial and temporal variations of excitation optical fields, manifesting the vertical bar E vertical bar(4) enhancements for both ERS and MRS processes at the same hotspots in agreement with our theoretical prediction. Furthermore, we find that the ERS calibration's performance limit can result from orientation variations of analyte molecules at hotspots.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available