4.6 Review

Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101474

Keywords

Environmental psychology; Human-environment interaction; Culture; Cross-cultural; Cross-national; Bibliometric analysis

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [HKUST16602119]
  2. Victoria University of Wellington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental psychology is a field concerned with transactions between humans and their environments. Since human-environment interactions are culture-bound, a fuller understanding of such interactions requires sensitivity to the role of culture in the ways researchers theorize human behavior, conduct empirical studies, and interpret observed findings. In this article, we aim to advance the development of a culturally informed understanding of human-environment interactions, which we refer to as cross-cultural environmental psychology. We first discuss why a cultural perspective is useful. We then survey the field of environmental psychology as indexed by publications in this journal with a complementary set of three bibliometric analyses, which show that the field lacks cultural diversity in both its research participants and its authors, and it is in need of more cross-border, particularly cross-continent, collaborations. We offer a summary of previous cross-cultural studies in terms of how the influence of culture was conceptualized and how cross-cultural data was collected. We also provide resources and recommendations to environmental psychology researchers who are interested in conducting cross-cultural studies. We conclude the article with an illustration of the important principles and recommendations with reference to the articles in this special issue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available