4.8 Article

Electron inelastic mean free path in water

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 12, Issue 40, Pages 20649-20657

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr04352d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Research Council for Technology and Production Case [12-126194]
  2. Advanced Materials for Energy-Water Systems (AMEWS) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid phase transmission electron microscopy (LPTEM) is rapidly developing as a powerful tool for probing processes in liquid environments with close to atomic resolution. Knowledge of the water thickness is needed for reliable interpretation and modelling of analytical studies in LPTEM, and is particularly essential when using thin liquid layers, required for achieving the highest spatial resolutions. The log-ratio method in electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) is often applied in TEM to quantify the sample thickness, which is measured relative to the inelastic mean free path (lambda(IMFP)). However, lambda(IMFP) itself is dependent on sample material, the electron energy, and the convergence and divergence angles of the microscope electronoptics. Here, we present a detailed quantitative analysis of the lambda(IMFP) of water as functions of the EELS collection angle (beta) at 120 keV and 300 keV in a novel nanochannel liquid cell. We observe good agreement with earlier studies conducted on ice, but find that the most widely used theoretical models significantly underestimate lambda(IMFP) of water. We determine an adjusted average energy-loss term (Em, water), and characteristic scattering angle theta(E, water) that improve the accuracy. The results provide a comprehensive knowledge of the lambda(IMFP) of water (or ice) for reliable interpretation and quantification of observations in LPTEM and cryo-TEM studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available