4.8 Article

Sinter-resistant Rh nanoparticles supported on γ-Al2O3 nanosheets as an efficient catalyst for dry reforming of methane

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 12, Issue 40, Pages 20922-20932

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr04644b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872111, 21473144]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in Chinese Universities [IRT_14R31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

gamma-Al2O3 nanosheet supported rhodium catalysts with Rh loadings between 0.05 and 2 wt% were prepared by the impregnation method and used for dry reforming of methane (DRM). It was found that Rh species on gamma-Al2O3 nanosheets demonstrated excellent stability against sintering at high temperature. After calcining in air at 800 degrees C followed by reducing with hydrogen at 600 degrees C, the average particle size of Rh at maximum distribution increases from 1.0 +/- 0.3 to 1.8 +/- 0.3 nm with an increase in Rh loadings in the catalysts from 0.05 to 2 wt%. Even after reducing with hydrogen at 900 degrees C, the average size of Rh particles in the catalysts still remained below 2 nm. The results of catalytic performance evaluation show that CH4 and CO2 conversions of 84% and 90%, respectively, with a H-2/CO ratio in syngas close to unity can be achieved with a catalyst of Rh loading of only 0.05 wt% at 750 degrees C. The performance of the catalyst remains stable for more than 200 h. No significant aggregation of the Rh particles is observed on the catalyst after the reaction. The results of XPS, H-2-TPR and O-2-TPD characterization methods indicate that the strong interaction between Rh and the gamma-Al2O3 nanosheets plays a key role in increasing the dispersion of Rh species in the catalyst and preventing it from sintering under high temperature conditions. This factor is also responsible for the superior activity and stability of the catalyst with extremely low Rh loading for the DRM reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available