4.7 Article

Performance Analysis of Vehicular Device-to-Device Underlay Communication

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 5409-5421

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2016.2627582

Keywords

Cellular networks; device-to-device communication; heterogeneous networks; mobile data offloading; vehicular communication

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. General Motors Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The demand for vehicular mobile data services has increased exponentially, which necessitates alternative data pipes for vehicular users other than the cellular network and dedicated short-range communication. In this paper, we study the performance of underlaid vehicular device-to-device (V-D2D) communications, where the cellular uplink resources are reused by V-D2D communications, considering the characteristics of the vehicular network. Specifically, we model the considered urban area by a grid-like street layout, with nonhomogeneous distribution of vehicle density. We then propose to employ a joint power control and mode selection scheme for the V-D2D communications. In the scheme, we use channel inversion to control the transmit power, in order to determine transmit power based on path loss rather than instantaneous channel state information (CSI), and avoid severe interference due to excessively large transmit power; the transmission mode is selected based on the biased channel quality, where D2D mode is chosen when the biased D2D link quality is not worse than the cellular uplink quality. Under the proposed scheme, two performance metrics of V-D2D underlaid cellular networks, i.e., signal-to-interference-plus-noise outage probability and link/network throughput, are theoretically analyzed. Simulation results validate our analysis and show the impacts of design parameters on the network performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available