4.7 Article

Novel Trust Framework for Vehicular Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 9498-9511

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2710124

Keywords

Connected vehicles; event; history; honest; malicious; recommendation; trust

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the Discovery Grant program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dedicated short range communication is proposed for vehicle to vehicle communications to learn about significant events in the network from neighboring vehicles. However, these neighbors may be malicious and report incorrect events in order to take advantage of the system. The malicious nodes may also provide incorrect recommendations about their peers in order to exert a stronger influence on the receiver's decision. Incorrect information and malicious nodes render the system unreliable for safety and emergency applications. In order to correctly identify the events as well as malicious nodes, a novel trust framework is proposed in this paper that studies all aspects of the trust in connected vehicle (CV) to CV communications. The nodes iteratively learn about the environment from received messages and then update the trust values of their neighbors. Nodes are classified on the basis of their trust values and reported events are also classified as true and false. Nodes advertise their recommendation about trusted and malicious neighbors. The proposed framework allows nodes to identify and filter recommendations from malicious nodes, and to discern true events. The performance of the proposed framework is evaluated experimentally using false and true positive rates, event detection probability and trust computation error. The proposed framework identifies malicious nodes and true events with high probability of more than 0.92 while keeping the trust computation error below 0.03.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available