4.3 Article

The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research Investigators

Journal

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 533-541

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12281

Keywords

Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA); early career investigators; interdisciplinary science; translational research competencies; team-science education

Funding

  1. University of Texas Medical Branch
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1TR000071]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. Institute for Translational Science at UTMB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiinstitutional research collaborations now form the most rapid and productive project execution structures in the health sciences. Effective adoption of a multidisciplinary team research approach is widely accepted as one mechanism enabling rapid translation of new discoveries into interventions in human health. Although the impact of successful team-based approaches facilitating innovation has been well-documented, its utility for training a new generation of scientists has not been thoroughly investigated. We describe the characteristics of how multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs) promote career development of translational research scholars through competency building, interprofessional integration, and team-based mentoring approaches. Exploratory longitudinal and outcome assessments from our experience show that MTT membership had a positive effect on the development of translational research competencies, as determined by a self-report survey of 32 scholars. We also observed that all trainees produced a large number of collaborative publications that appeared to be associated with their CTSA association and participation with MTTs. We conclude that the MTT model provides a unique training environment for translational and team-based learning activities, for investigators at early stages of career development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available