4.8 Article

Hybrid Microgrid Many-Objective Sizing Optimization With Fuzzy Decision

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 2702-2710

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3026140

Keywords

Distributed generators; fuzzy decision; hybrid microgrid; many-objective optimization; optimal sizing problem

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61976242, 61876059, 61902203]
  2. Opening Project of Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Computational Science at the Sun Yat-sen University [2018002]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017YFB1400100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The economics, reliability, and carbon efficiency of hybrid microgrid systems (HMSs) are often in conflict; hence, a reasonable design for the sizing of the initial microgrid is important. In this article, we propose an improved two-archive many-objective evolutionary algorithm (TA-MaEA) based on fuzzy decision to solve the sizing optimization problem for HMSs. For the HMS simulated in this article, costs, loss of power supply probability, pollutant emissions, and power balance are considered as objective functions. For the proposed algorithm, we employ two archives with different diversity selection strategies to balance convergence and diversity in the high-dimensional objective space. In addition, a fuzzy decision making method is proposed to further help decision makers obtain a solution from the Pareto front that optimally balances the objectives. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in solving the HMS sizing optimization problem is investigated for the case of Yanbu, Saudi Arabia. The experimental results show that, compared with the two-archive evolutionary algorithm for constrained many-objective optimization (C-TAEA), the clustering-based adaptive many-objective evolutionary algorithm (CA-MOEA), and the improved decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm (I-DBEA), the proposed algorithm can reduce the system costs by 7%, 13%, and 21%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available