4.6 Article

Facile and template-free strategy to construct N, P co-doped porous carbon nanosheets as a highly efficient electrocatalyst towards oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 877, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114732

Keywords

Carbon nanosheets; Template-free; Electrocatalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction; Heteroatom doping

Funding

  1. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20202BABL204019, 20181BAB203012]
  2. Foundation of Jiangxi Province Educational Committee [GJJ180365, GJJ170427]
  3. Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Polymer Micro/Nano Manufacturing and Devices [1410600834]
  4. Education Reform Project of ECUT [DHJG-19-18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional (2D) porous carbon nanomaterials are of great interest for various applications in the field of energy conversion and storage. The development of efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) with cost-efficient and simple approach still remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report a facile and template-free strategy to construct N, P co-doped porous carbon nanosheets (NPPC) by pyrolysis of calcium gluconate as carbon support and phosphonitrilic chloride trimer as the source N and P. The resultant NPPC, as metal-free electrocatalyst for ORR, exhibits outstanding electrocatalytic performance with a more positive half-wave potential of 0.87 V, longer durability and superior tolerance to methanol than those of commercial Pt/C in alkaline solution. Excellent ORR properties are contributed from the synergistic effect of abundant active sites of N, P and defects distributed in the carbon framework and 2D hierarchical pore morphology. Impressively, it is promising to inspire a general route for large-scale and facile synthesis of 2D porous carbon nanomaterials for application in new energy devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available