4.7 Article

Robust Adaptive Beamforming for Fast-Moving Target Detection With FDA-STAP Radar

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 973-984

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2628340

Keywords

Frequency diverse array; space-time adaptive processing; angle-Doppler-defocusing; robust adaptive beamforming; fast-moving target; semidefinite relaxation

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61601339]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M590925]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XJS16009, JBG160203, JB160228]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frequency diverse array (FDA), which employs a small frequency increment across the array elements, is able to resolve range ambiguity. However, the frequency diversity results in angle-Doppler-defocusing of target especially at a high speed in space-time adaptive processing (STAP) radar, thus, causing serious detection performance degradation. In this paper, a robust adaptive beamforming approach is proposed for the FDA-STAP radar to enhance fast-moving target detection performance. In our solution, a large feasible region is employed to include the true steering vector of target. To avoid the trivial solution, an angle-Dopplerde-focusing steering vector constraint is devised and incorporated into the large feasible region. The problem is formulated as a non-convex quadratically constrained quadratic program which is efficiently solved via semidefinite relaxation technique. Because the retrieved steering vector of target is close to the true one, the performance is significantly improved. It is demonstrated via computer simulations that the proposed algorithm is superior to the state-of-the-art methods, which includes maintaining the mainlobe of the beampattern and improving the signal-to-clutter-plus-noise ratio performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available