4.7 Article

Overexploitation and More Than a Decade of Failed Management Leads to No Recovery of the Galapagos Sea Cucumber Fishery

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.554314

Keywords

Isostichopus fuscus; overexploitation; small-scale fishery; management; Galapagos; maximum sustainable yield; reference points

Funding

  1. Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation [8072]
  2. Galapagos National Park Directorate financed the sea cucumber monitoring programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isostichopus fuscus is the most important sea cucumber species exploited in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. It was the most important fishery in the Galapagos in the early 2000s until overfishing led to its collapse and a 5-year total fishing ban was established (2016-2021) to try to recover it. The management of I. fuscus in the Galapagos has always considered the population density as an indicator for decision-making. The objective of this study is to review the density as an indicator of the population status of I. fuscus using a stock-production model incorporating covariates methodology. For the first time, population and fishing parameters (K, r, and q), reference points (MSY, B-MSY, F-MSY, and D-MSY) and indicators (B/B-MSY and F/F-MSY) were estimated for I. fuscus. The results indicate that the management measures have not prevented the overexploitation of this species for more than a decade. The goal of the I. fuscus management plan in the Galapagos, i.e., the recovering the fishery in a non-fishing scenario, will not be met by 2030. To accomplish its recovery six recommendations are proposed, including to extend the total ban of the fishery and to change the current management indicators to B/B-MSY and F/F-MSY. This study evidences that management measures taken with little scientific basis can have a pervasive effect on natural resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available