4.7 Article

Once-Per-Step Control of Ankle Push-Off Work Improves Balance in a Three-Dimensional Simulation of Bipedal Walking

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 406-418

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2636297

Keywords

Biomechanics; human performance augmentation; legged robotics; rehabilitation robotics; stability

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1300804, IIS-1355716, ACI-1053575]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1R43HD076518-01]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1300804] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1355716] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals with lower limb amputation have a high fall risk, which could be partially due to a lack of stabilizing control in conventional prostheses. Inspired by walking robots, we hypothesized that modulating prosthetic ankle push-off could help improve amputee balance. We developed a three-dimensional walking model, found limit cycles at two speeds, and designed state-feedback controllers that made once-per-step adjustments to ankle push-off work, fore-aft and medial-lateral foot placement, and ankle roll resistance. To assess balance, we applied increasing levels of random changes in ground height and lateral impulses until the model fell down within 100 steps. Although foot placement is known to be important for balance, we found that push-off control was at least twice as effective at recovering from both disturbances at both speeds. Push-off work affected both fore-aft and mediolateral motions, leading to good controllability, and was particularly well suited to recovery from steps up or down. Our results suggest that discrete control of ankle push-off may be more important than previously thought, and may guide the design of robotic prostheses that improve balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available