4.7 Article

Salient distractors open the door of perception: alpha desynchronization marks sensory gating in a working memory task

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76190-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UNKP-New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities
  2. Bolyai Research Fellowship Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  3. Predoctoral Fellowship Program of Semmelweis University [EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009]
  4. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities in Hungary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Focusing attention on relevant information while ignoring distracting stimuli is essential to the efficacy of working memory. Alpha- and theta-band oscillations have been linked to the inhibition of anticipated and attentionally avoidable distractors. However, the neurophysiological background of the rejection of task-irrelevant stimuli appearing in the focus of attention is not fully understood. We aimed to examine whether theta and alpha-band oscillations serve as an indicator of successful distractor rejection. Twenty-four students were enrolled in the study. 64-channel EEG was recorded during a modified Sternberg working memory task where weak and strong (salient) distractors were presented during the retention period. Event-related spectral perturbation in the alpha frequency band was significantly modulated by the saliency of the distracting stimuli, while theta oscillation was modulated by the need for cognitive control. Moreover, stronger alpha desynchronization to strong relative to weak distracting stimuli significantly increased the probability of mistakenly identifying the presented distractor as a member of the memory sequence. Therefore, our results suggest that alpha activity reflects the vulnerability of attention to distracting salient stimuli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available