4.7 Article

GPU-Based Fast Decoupled Power Flow With Preconditioned Iterative Solver and Inexact Newton Method

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 2695-2703

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2618889

Keywords

Fast decoupled power flow (FDPF); graphic processing unit (GPU); inexact newton method; iterative solver; precondition; conjugate gradient (CG) method

Funding

  1. NSF [ECCS-1128381]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51607033, 51607034]
  3. CURENT, an Engineering Research Center Program of NSF
  4. DOE under NSF [EEC-1041877]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Power flow is the most fundamental computation in power system analysis. Traditionally, the linear solution in power flow is solved by a direct method like LU decomposition on a CPU platform. However, the serial nature of the LU-based direct method is the main obstacle for parallelization and scalability. In contrast, iterative solvers, as alternatives to direct solvers, are generally more scalable with better parallelism. This study presents a fast decouple power flow (FDPF) algorithm with a graphic processing unit (GPU)-based preconditioned conjugate gradient iterative solver. In addition, the Inexact Newton method is integrated to further improve the GPU-based parallel computing performance for solving FDPF. The results show that the GPU-based FDPF maintains the same precision and convergence as the original CPU-based FDPF, while providing considerable performance improvement for several large-scale systems. The proposed GPU-based FDPF with the Inexact Newton method gives a speedup of 2.86 times for a system with over 10 000 buses if compared with traditional FDPF, both implemented based on MATLAB. This demonstrates the promising potential of the proposed FDPF computation using a preconditioned iterative solver under GPU architecture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available