4.7 Article

Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 3258-3265

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2616385

Keywords

Clustering; delaunay triangulation; power grid topology; synthetic networks

Funding

  1. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AR00D0714]
  2. National Science Foundation [1520864]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1520864] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a methodology and set of validation criteria for the systematic creation of synthetic power system test cases. The synthesized grids do not correspond to any real grid and are, thus, free from confidentiality requirements. The cases are built to match statistical characteristics found in actual power grids. First, substations are geographically placed on a selected territory, synthesized from public information about the underlying population and generation plants. A clustering technique is employed, which ensures the synthetic substations meet realistic proportions of load and generation, among other constraints. Next, a network of transmission lines is added. This paper describes several structural statistics to be used in characterizing real power system networks, including connectivity, Delaunay triangulation overlap, dc power flow analysis, and line intersection rate. The paper presents a methodology to generate synthetic line topologies with realistic parameters that satisfy these criteria. Then, the test cases can be augmented with additional complexities to build large, realistic cases. The methodology is illustrated in building a 2000 bus public test case that meets the criteria specified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available