4.7 Article

FT-IR study of early stages of alkali activated materials based on pyroclastic deposits (Mt. Etna, Sicily, Italy) using two different alkaline solutions

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120095

Keywords

Geopolymer; FTIR spectroscopy; Volcanic ash; Polycondensation reaction; Na and K-silicates; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Advanced Green Materials for Cultural Heritage (AGM for CuHe) project (PNR fund) [ARS01_00697, CUP E66C18000380005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The huge availability of volcanic deposits in Mt. Etna volcano and the wide use of volcanic materials as aggregates in local architecture encouraged us to apply them in alkaline environment to produce geopolymeric binders to restore historical buildings of Mt. Etna area. Two clusters of samples for each volcanic precursor (volcanic ash and ghiara paleo-soil) were produced, using 10 and 20% wt. of metakaolin and two different alkaline solutions based on sodium and potassium respectively. A comparative study was made in relation to activators used, focusing on evaluation of polycondensation step (in ATR); chemical and structural characterization (FT-IR); TGA analysis, qualitative XRD analysis and mechanical compressive test after 7 and 21 curing days. ATR results confirmed the occurrence of geopolymerization for all samples; FT-IR analysis showed a higher content of carbonates in potassium-samples, decreasing at increasing of metakaolin content. A low weight lost was recorded in consolidated samples, as well as a partial dissolution of volcanic phases. Higher mechanical compressive strengths for K-samples, reaching 89 MPa as highest value after 21 days, differently to sodium-samples (51 MPa) were recorded, reflecting the porosity of the different specimens. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available