4.7 Article

Tuning of the crystal engineering and photoelectrochemical properties of crystalline tungsten oxide for optoelectronic device applications

Journal

CRYSTENGCOMM
Volume 17, Issue 32, Pages 6070-6093

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ce00900f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (KCAP) at Sogang University - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0093885]
  2. Brain Korea 21 Plus Project [201423002.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The photocatalysis, chromism, and sensing capabilities of nanostructured tungsten oxides, such as tungsten trioxide (WO3), its suboxides (WOx, 0 < x < 3) and hydrates. WO3 center dot nH(2)O, n = 1/3 (0.33), 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, etc.), tungsten bronzes MxWO3 (M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and NH4), and metal tungstates (such as Bi2WO6 and CuWO4) have attracted much attention. To improve these properties, many strategies have been pursued, such as morphology control, doping, and heterostructuring. Crystal facet engineering has recently become a very important method of fine-tuning the physicochemical properties of semiconductors. The photocatalytic reactivity of a photocatalyst is significantly affected by its surface environment, including its surface electronic and atomic structures, which strongly depend on the crystal facets. It is believed that crystals with different exposed facets will have different properties, with the exposure of highly activated facets enhancing the photocatalytic and sensing properties. This article describes the syntheses of 2D WO3 crystals with the {002} facet primarily exposed, octahedral WO3 or WO3 center dot nH(2)O with exposed {111} facets, and WO3 films with dominant orientations, such as orientation along the {002} facet. WO3 doping, WO3-based heterostructuring and their applications are also presented in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available