4.6 Review

Design and fabrication of conductive polymer hydrogels and their applications in flexible supercapacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 44, Pages 23059-23095

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta07468c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21774098, 81773193, 81571799]
  2. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (Sichuan University) [sklpme2019-4-26]
  3. Zhejiang Province Preeminence Youth Fund [LR19H160002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, as an energy storage device with a fast charge and discharge speed, long cycle life, and good stability, flexible supercapacitors (SCs) have been extensively used in flexible electronic devices such as smart textiles, flexible display screens, and micro-robots. Combining the advantages of conductive materials and hydrogels, conductive polymer hydrogels have good flexibility, biocompatibility, and adjustable mechanical and electrochemical properties, which enable them to be used as electrolyte or electrode materials for flexible SCs, endowing flexible SCs with various excellent properties and meeting their various working requirements. This paper comprehensively reviews the flexible SCs based on conductive polymer hydrogels, from the design, synthesis and application aspects of conductive polymer hydrogels, the various superior functions (e.g., self-healing, high stretchability and compressibility, high toughness, electrochromic and shape memory) of flexible SCs based on conductive polymer hydrogels to different structures of flexible SCs, including fiber-shaped structures, all-in-one sandwich structures, and in-plane interdigital microstructures. Finally, we summarize the challenges faced by flexible SCs based on conductive polymer hydrogels, which provides new research directions and prospects for future development in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available