4.6 Article

A Novel Nature Inspired Meta-Heuristic Optimization Approach of GWO Optimizer for Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch Problems

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 202596-202610

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031640

Keywords

Optimal power flow (OPF); optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD); grey wolf algorithm (GWO); load flow analysis (LFA)

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0401406]
  2. Famous Teachers Cultivation Planning for Teaching of North China Electric Power University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel nature inspired meta heuristic optimization approach of Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm is employed to solved the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problems. Essentially, it is the sub and non-linear optimization problem of optimal power flow (OPF) in which the control parameters of the power networks are optimized. The Grey wolf optimizer (GWO) which is inspired from grey wolves' leadership and hunting behaviors to solve the ORPD problems. For which, the optimizer is tested on two test cases of IEEE30 standards specially, for 13 and 19 variables in order to get three fitness objectives for instance; transmission line losses (P-losses, MW), voltage deviation (VD), voltage stability index (VSI) and cost of energy in ($). During computing all fitness objectives, the minimum fitness values are possibly achieved by the finest settings of control variables. The simulation results are compared with other artificial intelligence methods in previous literature to ensure the superior performance of the GWO for ORPD problem. The consistency of GWO will further be validated through detailed statistical analysis including histogram illustrations, boxplots, empirical CDF plot, probability plot and plot of minimum fitness during each independent trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available