4.5 Review

Trajectory Modelling Techniques Useful to Epidemiological Research: A Comparative Narrative Review of Approaches

Journal

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 1205-1222

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S265287

Keywords

modelling techniques; growth mixture modelling; group-based trajectory modelling; latent class analysis; latent transition analysis; cluster analysis; sequence analysis

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Personalized Health Catalyst Grants - Development of predictive analytic models) [PCG155479]
  2. Fondation de l'Universite du Quebec en Abitibi-Temiscamingue (FUQAT)
  3. Quebec SUPPORT Unit (Support for People and PatientOriented Research and Trials) - CIHR
  4. Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec
  5. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (FRQS)
  6. CIHR Research Chair in health psychology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trajectory modelling techniques have been developed to determine subgroups within a given population and are increasingly used to better understand intra- and inter-individual variability in health outcome patterns over time. The objectives of this narrative review are to explore various trajectory modelling approaches useful to epidemiological research and give an overview of their applications and differences. Guidance for reporting on the results of trajectory modelling is also covered. Trajectory modelling techniques reviewed include latent class modelling approaches, ie, growth mixture modelling (GMM), group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM), latent class analysis (LCA), and latent transition analysis (LTA). A parallel is drawn to other individual-centered statistical approaches such as cluster analysis (CA) and sequence analysis (SA). Depending on the research question and type of data, a number of approaches can be used for trajectory modelling of health outcomes measured in longitudinal studies. However, the various terms to designate latent class modelling approaches (GMM, GBTM, LTA, LCA) are used inconsistently and often inter-changeably in the available scientific literature. Improved consistency in the terminology and reporting guidelines have the potential to increase researchers' efficiency when it comes to choosing the most appropriate technique that best suits their research questions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available