4.8 Article

Improving rural health care reduces illegal logging and conserves carbon in a tropical forest

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009240117

Keywords

planetary health; natural climate solutions; human health; conservation; tropical forests

Funding

  1. Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1656518]
  3. National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology [1611767]
  4. James and Nancy Kelso Fellowship through the Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship program at Stanford University
  5. Fulbright Foreign Student Program
  6. Program for Disease Ecology, Health, and the Environment at Stanford University
  7. Center for Innovation and Global Health of Stanford University
  8. Ecological Levers for Health Science for Nature and People Partnership-National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis working group
  9. University of California Global Health Institute Planetary Health Center of Expertise seed grant
  10. Stanford University Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies-Stanford Institute for Innovation in Developing Economies Global Poverty and Development Initiative grant
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1611767] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical forest loss currently exceeds forest gain, leading to a net greenhouse gas emission that exacerbates global climate change. This has sparked scientific debate on how to achieve natural climate solutions. Central to this debate is whether sustainably managing forests and protected areas will deliver global climate mitigation benefits, while ensuring local peoples' health and well-being. Here, we evaluate the 10-y impact of a human-centered solution to achieve natural climate mitigation through reductions in illegal logging in rural Borneo: an intervention aimed at expanding health care access and use for communities living near a national park, with clinic discounts offsetting costs historically met through illegal logging. Conservation, education, and alternative livelihood programs were also offered. We hypothesized that this would lead to improved health and well-being, while also alleviating illegal logging activity within the protected forest. We estimated that 27.4 km2 of deforestation was averted in the national park over a decade (similar to 70% reduction in deforestation compared to a synthetic control, permuted P = 0.038). Concurrently, the intervention provided health care access to more than 28,400 unique patients, with clinic usage and patient visitation frequency highest in communities participating in the intervention. Finally, we observed a dose-response in forest change rate to intervention engagement (person-contacts with intervention activities) across communities bordering the park: The greatest logging reductions were adjacent to the most highly engaged villages. Results suggest that this community-derived solution simultaneously improved health care access for local and indigenous communities and sustainably conserved carbon stocks in a protected tropical forest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available