4.2 Article

Familial mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in Mexico: Inheritance pattern and clinical features

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106450

Keywords

Familial epilepsy; Inheritance pattern; Mexican families; Genetics; Mesial temporal epilepsy

Funding

  1. CONACyT [CONACyT: 574048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to determine the inheritance pattern by which familial mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (FMTLE) is segregated in Mexican families, and to identify if there was an association between the clinical characteristics and the inheritance pattern. Method: We included a total of 25 families with two or more members affected with MTLE during two years and elaborated a family pedigree for each family. The inheritance pattern was classified as autosomal dominant (AD) or autosomal recessive (AR), considering the affected members. We used statistical analysis association and differences between clinical characteristics and inheritance patterns. Results: The affected families with the AD pattern were 15.7 fold times more likely to start seizures at 5 years of age or earlier than families with AR pattern, OR = 15.7 (IC 95% = 1.9-128.9). We observed a predominance and greater deja vu association (64.4% vs 31.3%; p = 0.021), OR = 3.9 (CI 95% = 1.1-13.5) in patients with AD versus AR pattern. Finally, we identified that patients with AD pattern had a likelihood of presenting emotional alterations 5.6 times higher than AR (OR = 5.6, IC = 1.1-27.5). Conclusion: FMTLE is a heterogeneous syndrome, both phenotypically and genotypically; thus, our findings may be helpful for clinical use to perform an early diagnosis, to provide timely treatment, and to prevent comorbidities associated to this disease. However, in order to identify the possible genetic causes underlying these inheritance patterns, the use of molecular studies is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available