4.8 Article

BDNF-induced local translation of GluA1 is regulated by HNRNP A2/B1

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 47, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2163

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation [2017M3C7A1023478]
  2. Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation [2019R1A2C2009440]
  3. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development of the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01324801]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1A2C2009440, 2017M3C7A1023478] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The AMPA receptor subunit GluA1 is essential for induction of synaptic plasticity. While various regulatory mechanisms of AMPA receptor expression have been identified, the underlying mechanisms of GluA1 protein synthesis are not fully understood. In neurons, axonal and dendritic mRNAs have been reported to be translated in a capin-dependent manner. However, molecular mechanisms of cap-independent translation of synaptic mRNAs remain largely unknown. Here, we show that GluA1 mRNA contains an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) in the 5'UTR. We also demonstrate that heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A2/B1 interacts with GuAl mRNA and mediates internal initiation of GluA1. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) stimulation increases IRES-mediated GuA1 translation via up-regulation of HNRNP A2/B1. Moreover, BDNF-induced GluA1 expression and dendritic spine density were significantly decreased in neurons lacking hnRNP A2/B1. Together, our data demonstrate that IRES-mediated translation of GluA1 mRNA is a previously unidentified feature of local expression of the AMPA receptor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available