4.7 Review

Overview and outlook of the strategies devoted to electrofluorescence surveys: Application to single cell secretion analysis

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116055

Keywords

Exocytosis; Fluorescence; Amperometry; Microelectrodes; Analytical coupling; False fluorescent neurotransmitters; Exosensors

Funding

  1. CNRS (UMR 8640), Ecole Normale Superieure, French Ministry of Research, Faculte des Sciences et Ingenierie - Sorbonne Universite
  2. Emergences Ville de Paris 2014 Grant
  3. Institut Universitaire de France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Secretion of neurotransmitters and hormones via vesicular exocytosis is a fundamental biological field where physicochemical machinery is still source of controversy. Over the last decades, real-time tech-niques have been developed at the single cell level including electrochemistry (amperometry) and fluorescence (total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy). This review especially focuses on the expected fruitful fluoroelectrochemical combination. Analytical constraints (experimental set-up configuration, use of transparent electrodes, microdevices properties, cell models, structure and physicochemical properties of electrofluorescent probes, presence of orphan events) of the TIRFM-amperometry combination are commented. A special attention is paid about the recent design of new dual spectroelectrochemical biomolecules (fluorescent neural markers, fluorescent adducts, false fluorescent neurotransmitters). Despite significant advances, this challenging combinatorial research continues and new obstacles (reaching in the same molecule adequate fluorescent, electrochemical and biological target properties) need to be overcome thus giving the impression that the final purpose is currently so close and so far. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available