4.8 Article

Micrometer-scale monolayer SnS growth by physical vapor deposition

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 12, Issue 45, Pages 23274-23281

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr06022d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI, Japan [JP19J13579]
  2. Samco Science and Technology Foundation
  3. Yazaki Memorial Foundation for Science and Technology
  4. Canon Foundation
  5. JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced Research Networks
  6. JSPS A3 Foresight Program
  7. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H00755, 19K21956, 18H03864, 19H02561]
  8. MEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center [JPMXP0112101001]
  9. PRESTO by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Japan [JPMJPR17NB]
  10. University of Tokyo [2018B7580, 2019A7451]
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K21956, 19H02561, 18H03864] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, monolayer SnS, a two-dimensional group IV monochalcogenide, was grown on a mica substrate at the micrometer-size scale by the simple physical vapor deposition (PVD), resulting in the successful demonstration of its in-plane room temperature ferroelectricity. However, the reason behind the monolayer growth remains unclear because it had been considered that the SnS growth inevitably results in a multilayer thickness due to the strong interlayer interaction arising from lone pair electrons. Here, we investigate the PVD growth of monolayer SnS from two different feed powders, highly purified SnS and commercial phase-impure SnS. Contrary to expectations, it is suggested that the mica substrate surface is modified by sulfur evaporated from the Sn2S3 contaminant in the as-purchased powder and the lateral growth of monolayer SnS is facilitated due to the enhanced surface diffusion of SnS precursor molecules, unlike the growth from the highly purified powder. This insight provides a guide to identify further controllable growth conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available