4.5 Article

Valorisation of table tomato crop by-products: Phenolic profiles and in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 307-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2020.09.006

Keywords

Table tomato varieties; By-products valorization; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant activity; Antimicrobial activity; Chlorophylls

Funding

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) through FCT/MCTES [UIDB/00690/2020]
  2. FCT
  3. FEDER Interreg Espana-Portugal [0377 Iberphenol 6 E]
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia [451-03-68/2020-14/200007]
  5. PEPAC Program (2015)
  6. [Norte-01-0247-FEDER-024479]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little attention has been paid to the phenolic composition and bioactive properties of primary tomato plant by-products (Solanum lycopersicum L.) as compared to fruits. In this study, axillary green shoots resulting from pruning and aerial biomass at the end of the cultivation cycle were characterized for their composition in chlorophylls and phenolic compounds, as well as for antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. The HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn analysis allowed identifying phenolic acids and flavonoids, with prevalence of quercetin3-O-rutinoside (rutin). The extracts had in vitro antioxidant and antihemolytic activity, especially those produced from pruning materials. Despite their low activity against the tested microfungi, some extracts had ability to inhibit and kill some bacteria more effectively than the antibiotic ampicillin. It was interesting to conclude that table tomato crop remains, currently with no commercial value, can be used to produce extracts with antioxidant and antibacterial activities for possible use in the agri-food sector as natural preservatives. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available