4.7 Article

Creating long-term weather data from thin air for crop simulation modeling

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 49-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.02.020

Keywords

Yield potential; Yeild variability; Weather data; Crop simulation model

Funding

  1. Robert Daugherty Water for Food Institute at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. CGIAR research program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simulating crop yield and yield variability requires long-term, high-quality daily weather data, including solar radiation, maximum (T-max) and minimum temperature (T-min), and precipitation. In many regions, however, daily weather data of sufficient quality and duration are not available. To overcome this limitation, we evaluated a new method to create long-term weather series based on a few years of observed daily temperature data (hereafter called propagated data). The propagated data are comprised of uncorrected gridded solar radiation from the Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resource dataset from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA POWER), rainfall from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) dataset, and location-specific calibration of NASA POWER T-max and T-min using a limited amount of observed daily temperature data. The distributions of simulated yields of maize, rice, or wheat with propagated data were compared with simulated yields using observed weather data at 18 sites in North and South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Other sources of weather data typically used in crop modeling for locations without long-term observed weather data were also included in the comparison: (i) uncorrected NASA POWER weather data and (ii) generated weather data using the MarkSim weather generator. Results indicated good agreement between yields simulated with propagated weather data and yields simulated using observed weather data. For example, the distribution of simulated yields using propagated data was within 10% of the simulated yields using observed data at 78% of locations and degree of yield stability (quantified by coefficient of variation) was very similar at 89% of locations. In contrast, simulated yields based entirely on uncorrected NASA POWER data or generated weather data using MarkSim were within 10% of yields simulated using observed data in only 44 and 33% of cases, respectively, and the bias was not consistent across locations and crops. We conclude that, for most locations, 3 years of observed daily T-max and T-min, data would allow creation of a robust weather data set for simulation of long-term mean yield and yield stability of major cereal crops. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available