4.7 Article

Personalized Adaptive Cruise Control Based on Online Driving Style Recognition Technology and Model Predictive Control

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 11, Pages 12482-12496

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3020335

Keywords

Vehicles; Acceleration; Automotive engineering; Adaptive systems; Cruise control; Predictive control; Machine learning; Personalized adaptive cruise control; driving style recognition; model predictive control; machine learning

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0100904]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61703178, 61790564, 61703176]
  3. China Automobile Industry and Development Joint Fund [U1664257, U1864201]
  4. Jilin Provincial Science Foundation of China [20180520200JH]
  5. Joint Project of Jilin University [SXGJSF2017-2-1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a personalized adaptive cruise control (ACC) system based on driving style recognition and model predictive control (MPC) to meet different driving styles while ensuring car-following, comfort and fuel-economy performances. To obtain the controller parameters corresponding to different driving styles, a set of real vehicle experiments are conducted to collect driving data of 66 randomly recruited drivers, then the experimental data is clustered through unsupervised machine learning method. On the basis of it, a driving style classifier is designed by supervised machine learning method, which can be used to recognize the driving style of drivers online. Then, the control problem of the personalized ACC system is described as a multi-objective optimization problem which is solved by MPC method. The simulation results show that the proposed personalized ACC system can meet the requirements of different driving styles and guarantee various performances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available