4.6 Review

Notch Signaling Function in the Angiocrine Regulation of Tumor Development

Journal

CELLS
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells9112467

Keywords

Notch; Delta-like; Jagged; angiogenesis; tumor; angiocrine

Categories

Funding

  1. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, I.P. (Lisbon, Portugal) [UIDB/00276/2020]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/00276/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of tumor growth being angiogenesis dependent had its origin in the observations of Judah Folkman in 1969 of a retinoblastoma in a child. Tumor angiogenesis is initiated when endothelial cells (ECs) respond to local stimuli and migrate towards the growing mass, which results in the formation of tubular structures surrounded by perivascular support cells that transport blood to the inner tumor. In turn, the neo-vasculature supports tumor development and eventual metastasis. This process is highly regulated by several signaling pathways. Central to this process is the Notch signaling pathway. Beyond the role of Notch signaling in tumor angiogenesis, a major hallmark of cancer development, it has also been implicated in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation and survival, in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, invasion and metastasis and in the regulation of cancer stem cells, in a variety of hematologic and solid malignancies. There is increasing evidence for the tumor vasculature being important in roles other than those linked to blood perfusion. Namely, endothelial cells act on and influence neighboring tumor cells by use of angiocrine factors to generate a unique cellular microenvironment, thereby regulating tumor stem-like cells' homeostasis, modulating tumor progression, invasiveness, trafficking and metastasis. This review will focus on Notch signaling components that play a part in angiocrine signaling in a tumor setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available