4.8 Article

Effect of water in a non-aqueous electrolyte on electrochemical Mg2+ insertion into WO3

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 477, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229015

Keywords

Magnesium batteries; Surface diffusion; Tungsten oxide; Ion insertion; Water; Kinetics

Funding

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [571800]
  3. State of North Carolina
  4. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium batteries are promising candidates for beyond lithium-ion batteries, but face several challenges including the need for solid state materials capable of reversible Mg2+ insertion. Of fundamental interest is the need to understand and improve the Mg2+ insertion kinetics of oxide-based cathode materials in non-aqueous electrolytes. The addition of water in non-aqueous electrolytes has been shown to improve the kinetics of Mg2+ insertion, but the mechanism and the effect of water concentration are still under debate. We investigate the systematic addition of water into a non-aqueous Mg electrolyte and its effect on Mg2+ insertion into WO3. We find that the addition of water leads to improvement in the Mg2+ insertion kinetics up to 6[H2O] : [Mg](2+). We utilize electrochemistry coupled to ex situ characterization to systematically explore four potential mechanisms for the electrochemical behavior: water co-insertion, proton (co)insertion, beneficial interphase formation, and water-enhanced surface diffusion. Based on these studies, we find that while proton co-insertion likely occurs, the dominant inserting species is Mg2+, and propose that the kinetic improvement upon water addition is due to enhanced surface diffusion of ions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available