4.5 Article

First Molecular Detection of Babesia ovis, Theileria spp., Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia ruminantium in Goats from Western Uganda

Journal

PATHOGENS
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9110895

Keywords

Babesia; Theileria; Anaplasma; Ehrlichia; goats; Uganda

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan International Cooperation Agency-African Business Education Initiative (JICA-ABE Initiative)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [18kk0188]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Core-to-Core Program
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18KK0188] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ticks and tick-borne diseases are major impediments to livestock production. To date, there have been several studies on the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in cattle, but very few studies have documented TBPs in goats in Uganda. In this study, polymerase chain reaction assays and sequence analysis of different molecular markers were used to assess the presence and genetic characteristics of TBPs in 201 goats from Kasese district in western Uganda. The risk factors associated with TBP infections were also analyzed. We detected Theileria spp. (13.4%), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (10.9%), Anaplasma ovis (5.5%), Babesia ovis (5.5%), and Ehrlichia ruminantium (0.5%). The sequences of B. ovis ssu rRNA and A. ovis msp4 genes showed some degree of diversity among the parasite isolates in this study. The E. ruminantium pCS20 sequence formed a well-supported clade with isolates from Amblyomma variegatum ticks from Uganda. Wildlife interaction, sampling location, low body condition score, tick infestation, and herd size were significantly associated with TBP infections in the goats. The findings in this study provide important information on the epidemiology of tick-borne pathogens in Uganda, and show that goats could be potential reservoirs for tick-borne pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available