4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Secure Degrees of Freedom of the Gaussian Diamond-Wiretap Channel

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 496-508

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2016.2623795

Keywords

Physical layer security; secure degrees of freedom; diamond-wiretap channel; artificial noise-beamforming; artificial noise-alignment

Funding

  1. QNRF, a member of Qatar Foundation, under NPRP [5-603-2-243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we consider the Gaussian diamond-wiretap channel that consists of an orthogonal broadcast channel from a source to two relays and a Gaussian fast-fading multiple access-wiretap channel from the two relays to a legitimate destination and an eavesdropper. For the multiple access part, we consider both the case with full channel state information (CSI) and the case with no eavesdropper's CSI, at the relays and the legitimate destination. For both the cases, we establish the exact secure degrees of freedom and generalize the results for multiple relays. Our results show: 1) how to strike a balance between sending message symbols and common noise symbols from the source to the relays in the broadcast component and 2) how to combine artificial noise-beamforming and noise-alignment techniques at the relays in the multiple access component. In the case with full CSI, we propose a scheme where the relays simultaneously beamform common noise signals in the null space of the legitimate destination's channel, and align them with the message signals at the eavesdropper. In the case with no eavesdropper's CSI, we present a scheme that efficiently utilizes the broadcast links by incorporating computation between the message and common noise symbols at the source. Finally, most of our achievability and converse techniques can also be adapted to the Gaussian (non-fading) channel model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available