4.6 Article

From discourse to pathology: Automatic identification of Parkinson's disease patients via morphological measures across three languages

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 191-205

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.020

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Linguistic assessments; Morphology; Automated speech analysis; Cross-linguistic validity

Funding

  1. CONICET
  2. CONICYT/FONDECYT Regular [1170010]
  3. FONCYT-PICT [2017-1818, 2017-1820]
  4. FONDAP [15150012]
  5. COLCIENCIAS [1106-744-55314]
  6. CODI at the University of Antioquia [PRG 2017-15530]
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [766287]
  8. Czech Ministry of Health [NV19-04-00120]
  9. OP VVV MEYS (Research Center for Informatics) [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000765]
  10. Sistema General de Regalias de Colombia [BPIN2018000100059]
  11. Universidad del Valle [CI 5316]
  12. Programa Interdisciplinario de Investigacion Experimental en Comunicacion y Cognicion (PIIECC), Facultad de Humanidades, USACH
  13. GBHI [ALZ UK-20-639295]
  14. MultiPartner Consortium - National Institutes of Aging of the National Institutes of Health [R01AG057234]
  15. Alzheimer's Association [SG-20725707-ReDLat]
  16. Rainwater Foundation
  17. Global Brain Health Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Embodied cognition research on Parkinson's disease (PD) points to disruptions of frontostriatal language functions as sensitive targets for clinical assessment. However, no existing approach has been tested for crosslinguistic validity, let alone by combining naturalistic tasks with machine-learning tools. To address these issues, we conducted the first classifier-based examination of morphological processing (a core frontostriatal function) in spontaneous monologues from PD patients across three typologically different languages. The study comprised 330 participants, encompassing speakers of Spanish (61 patients, 57 matched controls), German (88 patients, 88 matched controls), and Czech (20 patients, 16 matched controls). All subjects described the activities they perform during a regular day, and their monologues were automatically coded via morphological tagging, a computerized method that labels each word with a part-of-speech tag (e.g., noun, verb) and specific morphological tags (e.g., person, gender, number, tense). The ensuing data were subjected to machine-learning analyses to assess whether differential morphological patterns could classify between patients and controls and reflect the former's degree of motor impairment. Results showed robust classification rates, with over 80% of patients being discriminated from controls in each language separately. Moreover, the most discriminative morphological features were associated with the patients' motor compromise (as indicated by Pearson r correlations between predicted and collected motor impairment scores that ranged from moderate to moderate-to-strong across languages). Taken together, our results suggest that morphological patterning, an embodied frontostriatal domain, may be distinctively affected in PD across languages and even under ecological testing conditions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available