4.7 Article

Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Images

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 3257-3267

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2927182

Keywords

Nuclei segmentation; histopathology segmentation; computational pathology; deep learning; adversarial training; synthetic data; synthetic pathology data

Funding

  1. Nvidia GPU grant program
  2. Google Cloud Research Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nuclei segmentation is a fundamental task for various computational pathology applications including nuclei morphology analysis, cell type classification, and cancer grading. Deep learning has emerged as a powerful approach to segmenting nuclei but the accuracy of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) depends on the volume and the quality of labeled histopathology data for training. In particular, conventional CNN-based approaches lack structured prediction capabilities, which are required to distinguish overlapping and clumped nuclei. Here, we present an approach to nuclei segmentation that overcomes these challenges by utilizing a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) trainedwith syntheticand real data. We generate a large dataset of H&E training images with perfect nuclei segmentation labels using an unpaired GAN framework. This synthetic data along with real histopathology data from six different organs are used to train a conditional GAN with spectral normalization and gradient penalty for nucleisegmentation. This adversarial regression framework enforces higher-order spacial-consistency when compared to conventional CNN models. We demonstrate that this nuclei segmentation approach generalizes across different organs, sites, patients and disease states, and outperforms conventional approaches, especially in isolating individual and overlapping nuclei.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available