4.1 Article Data Paper

Genome-wide methylation data from R1 (wild-type) and the transgenic Dnmt1Tet/Tet mouse embryonic stem cells overexpressing DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106242

Keywords

Epigenetics; Schizophrenia; Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS); Next generation sequencing (NGS)

Funding

  1. Scientific and Engineering Research Board
  2. OPERA (BITS Pilani)
  3. Centre for Human Disease Research, BITS Pilani Hyderabad Campus
  4. Department of Biotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in epigenetic mechanisms are well-recognized in multiple neurodevelopmental disorders including Schizophrenia (SZ). In addition to aberrant epigenetic marks, dysregulated epigenetic machinery was also identified among the contributory factors in SZ patients. Among these, overexpression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) was the first to be identified. In this context, Dnmt1(tet/tet) (Tet/Tet), a mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) line that overexpresses DNMT1 in ESCs and neurons, was developed to study abnormal neurogenesis. In an attempt to understand whether DNMT1 overexpression is associated with aberrant DNA methylation, we compared the genome-wide methylation levels of R1 (wild-type) and Tet/Tet ESCs and their neuronal derivatives by RRBS. The RRBS data (GSE152817) showed an average mappability of 59% and an average coverage of 40X per locus. The data was processed to determine the methylation percentages of target genes and was visualized using the UCSC genome browser. The observed methylation differences were validated by Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis (COBRA). The methylome data described here can be used to study the relationship between DNMT1 overexpression, alterations in methylation levels and dysregulation of SZ-associated genes. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available