4.5 Article

Drying kinetic, quality, energy and exergy performance of hot air-rotary drum drying of green peas using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 168-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2020.08.011

Keywords

Green pea; Hot air-rotary drum dryer; Energy; Color; Exergy improvement potential

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this paper was to study the drying kinetic, quality, energy and exergy performance of green peas in a hot air-rotary drum dryer using the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model. The effect of air temperature and rotary rotation speed was examined. The drying tests were performed at three air temperature levels of 40, 55 and 70 degrees C and three rotation speeds of 5, 10 and 15 rpm. The modeling of kinetic, quality (color, shrinkage, and rehydration ratio), energy and exergy indices of the green pea drying was also investigated using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The results showed that the energy utilization rate of the process varied in the range of 0.0121-0.1556 kJ/s. The minimum and maximum values of energy utilization ratio were respectively obtained in the drying conditions at 70 degrees C and rotation speed of 15 rpm, and at 40 degrees C and rotation speed of 15 rpm. Reducing the drying temperature and speed of rotation reduced the quality properties. Minimum values of color (AE) and shrinkage was 64.95 1.67 and 39.19 +/- 1.05, respectively. The exergy loss rate and average exergy efficiency varied from 0.02 to 0.11 kJ/s and from 0.5434 to 0.8382, respectively. The average rate of exergy improvement potential increased with increasing air temperature and rotary rotation speed. The highest R-2 value for the prediction of moisture ratio, energy utilization, energy utilization ratio, exergy loss and exergy efficiency with the ANFIS model was 0.9996, 0.9999, 0.9995, 0.9989 and 0.9996, respectively. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available