4.8 Article

A Fitting Model for Feature Selection With Fuzzy Rough Sets

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 741-753

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2574918

Keywords

Dependency function; feature selection; fuzzy rough set; fuzzy similarity relation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572082, 61473111, 61363056, 61303131]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2014020142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fuzzy rough set is an important rough set model used for feature selection. It uses the fuzzy rough dependency as a criterion for feature selection. However, this model can merely maintain a maximal dependency function. It does not fit a given dataset well and cannot ideally describe the differences in sample classification. Therefore, in this study, we introduce a new model for handling this problem. First, we define the fuzzy decision of a sample using the concept of fuzzy neighborhood. Then, a parameterized fuzzy relation is introduced to characterize the fuzzy information granules, using which the fuzzy lower and upper approximations of a decision are reconstructed and a new fuzzy rough set model is introduced. This can guarantee that the membership degree of a sample to its own category reaches the maximal value. Furthermore, this approach can fit a given dataset and effectively prevents samples from being misclassified. Finally, we define the significance measure of a candidate attribute and design a greedy forward algorithm for feature selection. Twelve datasets selected from public data sources are used to compare the proposed algorithm with certain existing algorithms, and the experimental results show that the proposed reduction algorithm is more effective than classical fuzzy rough sets, especially for those datasets for which different categories exhibit a large degree of overlap.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available