4.8 Article

Approaches to T-S Fuzzy-Affine-Model-Based Reliable Output Feedback Control for Nonlinear Ito Stochastic Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 569-583

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2566810

Keywords

Ito stochastic systems; mode-dependent Lyapunov function; nonlinear systems; reliable output feedback control; Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy-affine systems

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61374031, 61503091, 61522306, 61525303]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570282]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Z14056]
  4. Harbin Special Funds for Technological Innovation Research [2014RFQXJ067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper deals with the problem of reliable and robust H-infinity static output feedback (SOF) controller synthesis for continuous-time nonlinear stochastic systems with actuator faults. The nonlinear stochastic plant is expressed by an Ito-type Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy-affine model with parametric uncertainties, and a Markov process is employed to model the occurrence of actuator fault. The purpose is to design an admissible piecewise SOF controller, such that the resulting closed-loop system is stochastically stable with a prescribed disturbance attenuation level in an H-infinity sense. Specifically, based on a Markovian lyapunov function combined with Ito differential formula, S-procedure, and some matrix inequality convexification procedures, two new approaches to the reliable SOF controller analysis and synthesis are proposed for the underlying stochastic fuzzy-affine systems. It is shown that the existence of desired reliable controllers is fully characterized in terms of strict linear matrix inequalities. Finally, simulation examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness and advantages of the developed methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available