4.8 Article

Fault Detection for Fuzzy Systems With Multiplicative Noises Under Periodic Communication Protocols

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 2384-2395

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2774193

Keywords

Adjustable threshold; fault detection (FD); fuzzy model; multiplicative noises; networked system; periodical communication; round-robin protocol; residual evaluation function

Funding

  1. Royal Society of the U.K.
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61329301, 61374039]
  3. Hujiang Foundation of China [C14002, D15009]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is concerned with the fault detection problem for a class of networked fuzzy systems with multiplicative noises on both system states and measurement outputs. In view of the limited communication capacity, a periodical communication protocol (i.e., the round-robin protocol) is adopted to undertake the transmission task between the sensors and the fault detection filter, which leads to periodical delays in the overall system. A Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy-model-based fault detection filter is constructed to produce the residual signal and an auxiliary error system is established to facilitate the stability analysis of the error dynamics. With the aid of Lyapunov stability theory, sufficient conditions are obtained that ensure the exponentially mean-square stability of the error dynamics with prescribed H-infinity performance constraint. The desired fault detection filter is designed by solving a convex optimization problem via the semidefinite programme method. A finite-time evaluation function and an adjustable threshold are introduced in order to detect the possible faults effectively. The effectiveness of the proposed fault detection scheme is validated by a numerical simulation example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available