4.6 Article

Open-Framework Structure Based Cathode Materials Coupled with Metallic Anodes for Rechargeable Multivalent Ion Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 167, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abcd10

Keywords

Open-framework structure; Multivalent ion battery; Hybrid electrolyte; Metallic anode; Energy storage mechanism

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018BEM033]
  2. Taishan Scholar Foundation [ts20130929]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19CX05002A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rechargeable batteries based on multivalent chemistry represent a promising avenue in grid-scale and portable energy storage devices, especially when multivalent metal with high energy density is used as the anode. Owing to the unique advantages of large 3D diffusion channels, multiple oxidation states of metal ions, and the ability to modulate the size of the intercalation channels for multivalent ions (Zn2+, Mg2+, Al2+, Ca2+) intercalation/deintercalation, open framework materials are regarded as ideal cathodes. Herein, this review firstly provides an introduction of recent open-framework structure based cathode materials including Prussian blue and its analogs (PB/PBAs), NASICONs, Zinc vanadate (zinc pyrovanadate, e.g., Zn3V2O7(OH)(2)2H(2)O and alpha-Zn2V2O7, zinc n-vanadate, e.g., Zn(OH)VO4), and Molybdenum-vanadium oxide (Mo2.5+yVO9+z) along with a presentation of their energy storage mechanisms. Afterwards, representative examples of such intercalated materials applied to multivalent ion batteries are considered. Some strategies to further improve the electrochemical performances of open-framework structure based cathode materials are also presented. Finally, the challenges and development directions of these materials in rechargeable multivalent ion battery systems are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available