4.5 Article

Associations between markers of cellular and humoral immunity to rubella virus following a third dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 38, Issue 50, Pages 7897-7904

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.071

Keywords

Rubella; Measles-mumps-rubella; MMR; Cytokine; Chemokine; Immunity, Innate; Immunity, Cellular; Immunity, Humoral

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R37AI048793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Rubella virus (RV) was eliminated in the United States in 2004, although a small portion of the population fails to develop long-term immunity against RV even after two doses of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. We hypothesized that inherent biological differences in cytokine and chemokine signaling likely govern an individual's response to a third dose of the vaccine. Methods: Healthy young women (n = 97) were selected as study participants if they had either low or high extremes of RV-specific antibody titer after two previous doses of MMR vaccine. We measured cytokine and chemokine secretion from RV-stimulated PBMCs before and 28 days after they received a third dose of MMR vaccine and assessed correlations with humoral immune response outcomes. Results: High and low antibody vaccine responders exhibited a strong pro-inflammatory cellular response, with an underlying Th1-associated signature (IL-2, IFN-gamma, MIP-1 beta, IP-10) and suppressed production of most Th2-associated cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13). IL-10 and IL-4 exhibited significant negative associations with neutralizing antibody titers and memory B cell ELISpot responses among low vaccine responders. Conclusion: IL-4 and IL-10 signaling pathways may be potential targets for understanding and improving the immune response to rubella vaccination or for designing new vaccines that induce more durable immunity. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available