4.6 Article

Relating Extra Connectivity and Extra Conditional Diagnosability in Regular Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1086-1097

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TDSC.2017.2726541

Keywords

Program processors; Computational modeling; Computer science; Fault diagnosis; Electronic mail; Hypercubes; Extra conditional fault-diagnosability; extra node-connectivity; fault diagnosis; PMC model; general regular graphs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572010, U1405255, 61072080]
  2. Foundation of Cloud Computing and Big Data for Agriculture and Forestry [117-612014063]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20113219120019]
  4. Fujian Province University Industry Cooperation of Major Science and Technology Project [2017H6005]
  5. Fujian Normal University Innovative Research Team [IRTL1207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The h-extra node-connectivity of a graph G is the size of a minimal node-set, whose removal will disconnect G, but each remaining component has no fewer h + 1 nodes. Based on h-extra node-connectivity, the h-extra conditional fault-diagnosability of networks has been proposed for a better, more realistic measure of networks' fault-tolerability. It is the maximal x such that G is h-extra conditionally x-fault-diagnosable. This paper will establish a relationship between the h-extra node-connectivity and h-extra conditional fault-diagnosability for a regular graph G, under the classic PMC diagnostic model. We will apply the newly found relationship to a variety of well-known regular networks, to directly obtain their h-extra conditional fault-diagnosability. The significance of the paper's work is that it relates the notions of h-extra node-connectivity and h-extra conditional fault-diagnosability, so that a regular network's h-extra conditional fault-diagnosability may be known once its h-extra node-connectivity is known.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available